sustainability
E-Waste ERP
Collection-to-recovery traceability with EPR and CPCB reporting built in, so compliance comes out of daily operations.
- Chain-of-custody tracking
- EPR credit management
- CPCB and SPCB returns
Chain-of-custody traceability and EPR compliance produced as a by-product of normal yard operations.
Sites live
4
Open items
38
Variance
0.04%
Throughput · last 12 periods
E-waste recyclers and dismantlers need ERP that traces material from collection through segregation, dismantling and recovery to final disposal, with timestamped chain-of-custody records. The same operational data must generate Extended Producer Responsibility fulfilment reports and Central Pollution Control Board returns.
The gap
Each of these is a data-capture problem before it is a governance problem. Hardware that records automatically fixes them; policies do not.
Paper records assembled after the fact rarely reconcile with physical stock, which is exactly what an audit or a producer due-diligence exercise tests.
Producer and PRO tonnage commitments tracked separately from operational weighing diverge, and the gap surfaces at quarter end.
Without dismantling-stage output capture, nobody knows which input categories or collection sources are actually profitable to process.
Intake that exceeds permitted quantity is often discovered during inspection rather than prevented at the gate.
Material dispatched to a vendor whose permit has lapsed or does not cover that category transfers regulatory exposure back to the recycler.
CPCB and state board returns reconstructed from memory and spreadsheets at deadline are both error-prone and expensive in staff time.
Consignments traced from collection through segregation, dismantling and recovery to disposal, timestamped and attributable at every step.
Producer and PRO agreements with target tonnage, fulfilment measured against actually processed batches, and audit documentation packs.
Recovered material measured against input tonnage per batch and per collection source, so commercial decisions use real numbers.
Authorised quantity checked as material arrives, with warnings before the permitted limit is reached.
Authorised vendor register with permit validity and category coverage, blocking dispatch to a lapsed or out-of-scope vendor.
CPCB and state board returns generated from the same weighing and batch records that run the yard.
A producer buying EPR credits is buying documented, auditable evidence that a specific tonnage was processed properly. A recycler who cannot produce that trail on demand has a sales problem, not just a filing problem.
The way to make the trail reliable is to generate it from operations rather than assemble it afterwards. Material weighed at collection, batched at intake, tracked through dismantling and reconciled at recovery produces the record automatically.
E-waste profitability comes down to how much copper, aluminium, precious metal and reusable component comes out of a tonne of mixed input. Without dismantling-stage capture, yield is a guess and every commercial decision about which input to accept is made blind.
Authorised capacity is a hard regulatory boundary. Checking it at intake — before material is on site — is the only point at which the check is useful.
Sending material to a downstream recycler whose authorisation has lapsed puts the exposure back on you. A vendor register with permit validity, enforced at dispatch, closes that.
Modules
Sector-specific modules, not a generic ERP with the labels changed.
Pickup scheduling, vehicle routing and collection-point weighing, with a consignment note raised at the bulk consumer gate so custody starts where the material does.
Inbound weighing against the consignment note, category classification and batch creation, with authorised annual capacity checked before the load is accepted onto the yard.
Sorting into the schedule categories, hazardous fractions kept separate, and batch location recorded so physical stock in the shed matches the register on any given day.
Work orders per batch with labour and time captured, and component-level output recorded as boards, cables, casings and reusable parts come off the line.
Recovered copper, aluminium, plastic and precious-metal fractions measured against input tonnage per batch, giving yield by category and by collection source.
Producer and PRO targets tracked against processed tonnage, with audit documentation packs and board returns drawn from the same weighing records.
End to end
Every stage writes to the same ledger, so the number at the end reconciles with the number at the start.
Material picked up from bulk consumers, dealers or collection centres is weighed at source and issued a consignment note that starts the chain of custody.
Weighbridge capture at the facility gate against the consignment, with the difference from source weight recorded and remaining authorised capacity checked before acceptance.
Mixed input is sorted into e-waste categories and hazardous fractions, each becoming a batch with its own weight, location and source lineage in the register.
Work orders release batches to the line. Output components and residual fractions are weighed back in, so what went in and what came out reconcile per batch.
Recovered materials are quantified by category and yield is compared with expected ranges, writing to inventory for sale and to the yield analysis by source.
Residues and non-processable fractions go only to registered downstream recyclers or TSDFs whose authorisation is current, with the manifest raised at despatch.
The recycling certificate for the producer is issued against specific processed batches, and the same records populate EPR fulfilment and pollution board returns.
Hardware & integrations
Automatic capture is what makes the numbers trustworthy. Manual entry is where leakage starts.
Inbound and outbound weight is the entire evidence base for an e-waste facility. Estimated tonnage cannot support a recycling certificate or survive a producer audit.
Each batch and dismantled fraction carries a scannable label, which is what keeps the chain of custody attached to physical material rather than to a spreadsheet row.
Route and timestamp per pickup proves the consignment travelled from the declared source to the authorised facility, closing the gap regulators probe hardest.
Footage linked to intake and work orders supports producer due diligence visits and deters the informal diversion of high-value boards before they reach recovery.
Statutory
Filing should be a report you run, not a month-end reconstruction from paper.
Recyclers register on the CPCB EPR portal for e-waste and generate certificates only up to their registered capacity, which is why intake limits belong at the gate.
Authorisation from the state pollution control board, category-wise handling obligations and annual returns in the prescribed form, all drawn from batch records.
Residues moving to a treatment, storage and disposal facility travel on Form 10 manifests under the Hazardous and Other Wastes Rules, with copies retained.
Purchase from unregistered sellers, reverse charge where it applies and e-invoicing on recovered material sales, all posted from the same operational transactions.
Board consent under the Water and Air Acts sets processing capacity and site conditions, with renewal dates tracked because operating on a lapsed consent stops everything.
End to end
chain of custody per batch
2-5%
recovery yield improvement
Days to hours
return preparation time
4-8 weeks
facility go-live
Recommended
sustainability
Collection-to-recovery traceability with EPR and CPCB reporting built in, so compliance comes out of daily operations.
Answers
No generic discovery call. You will be speaking to a consultant who has implemented in this sector and can talk about your process in your vocabulary.
Send us a weighbridge slip, a BOQ or a stock register. We will configure the demo around it, so you are judging the fit — not a canned dataset.
Prefer to talk? +91 94897 49361